Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 3,842 User benchmarks, average bench 83% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 89.6 2-Core 210 72% 128 Pts	4-Core 401 8-Core 677 66% 539 Pts	64-Core 775 48% 775 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 90%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK256MBFZ 256GB 162 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 286 275 266 275 286 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Read 400 Write 409 Mixed 329 SusWrite 284 80% 355 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 30.2 84% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 347 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 245 204% 296 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 4x16GB 577 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 39.7 MC Write 49.7 MC Mixed 40.2 123% 43.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 20.5 SC Mixed 19.5 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 124%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	740x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	376x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	223x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	144x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	129x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	122x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	184x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	177x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	157x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16