Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3240 37,789 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3240 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	54% Above average	Memory 82 1-Core 74.6 2-Core 124 58% 93.7 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 160 21% 156 Pts	64-Core 158 10% 158 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 38,053 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Gigabyte(1458 2556) 1GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Lighting 14.6 Reflection 18.6 Parallax 23.4 12% 18.9 fps	MRender 14.8 Gravity 16.2 Splatting 13 12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 14%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB 8,135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: H190117H SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 137 123 91 68 51 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.8% Average	Read 216 Write 196 Mixed 161 SusWrite 98.1 38% 168 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 43.1 4K Mixed 18.5 72% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 88.8 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 116 88% 116 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown L196 05/2012 2M Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.9% Average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 13.1 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 12.6 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 76.8 52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	452x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	219x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	145x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $287

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16