HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221212
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 26 '23 at 19:52
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 87.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 225
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 783
71% 595 Pts
64-Core 987
61% 987 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$394
HP(103C 8552) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3892 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 162
Parallax 161
134% 163 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 144
Splatting 122
120% 151 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 183 169 161 168 161 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.4% Good
Read 98.6
Write 150
Mixed 243
SusWrite 175
38% 167 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 26.9
102% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 427
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 258
217% 319 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 193%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
157GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 275 275 276 275 289 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 389
Write 285
Mixed 304
SusWrite 292
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 36.7
115% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 211
188% 285 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 185 184 185 184 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 167
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 184
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U6D8ME-16X KHX3200C16D4/16GX 32GB
2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
76.5% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 21.9
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 23.8
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback