| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H410M S2H (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 11 |
| BIOS Date | 20201215 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 26 '23 at 18:41 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | ISR-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
74.4%
Very good
|
74% 131 Pts
|
64% 524 Pts
|
50% 800 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 4027) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.4%
Average
|
44% 54 fps
|
43% 53.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 139 35 40 84 32 MB/s
|
43.9%
Average
|
28% 124 MB/s
|
74% 28.1 MB/s
|
86% 171 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
270GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 33 73 89 102 79 MB/s
|
33.7%
Below average
|
46% 63.2 MB/s
|
172% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
WD Elements 2621 1TB
924GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 38 39 40 40 MB/s
|
23.1%
Poor
|
48% 35.3 MB/s
|
133% 1.57 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CB8GU2666.C8ET 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
72.6%
Very good
|
76% 26.7 GB/s
|
54% 19 GB/s
|
45% 88.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H410M S2H Builds (Compare 2,582 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H410M S2H
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-10400FIntel $99Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 877x |
| Core i3-10100Intel $94Bench 80%, 24,563 samples | 452x |
| Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples | 414x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 214x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 211x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 199x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $434 |