PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 99.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B560M Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210507 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Mar 26 '23 at 17:27 |
Run Duration | 203 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i5-11400F-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
|
85.9%
Excellent
|
92% 174 Pts
|
86% 699 Pts
|
68% 1,102 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia RTX 3070-$450
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
145%
Outstanding
|
173% 198 fps
|
125% 157 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$50
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 267 266 258 253 246 MB/s
|
99.7%
Outstanding
|
73% 326 MB/s
|
158% 59.1 MB/s
|
213% 312 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$111
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2165 2310 2307 2292 2254 2290 MB/s
|
403%
Outstanding
|
522% 2,316 MB/s
|
337% 119 MB/s
|
1,026% 1,380 MB/s
|
![]() WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
642GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 122 121 119 120 MB/s
|
73.9%
Very good
|
85% 116 MB/s
|
224% 1.67 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
68.4%
Good
|
71% 24.9 GB/s
|
55% 19.3 GB/s
|
42% 95.2 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 22 | 1 | 144 | 24.5" | 1280 720 | IVM613E PL2560H |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-11400FIntel $130Bench 94%, 38,461 samples | 556x |
Core i5-10400FIntel $101Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 446x |
Core i5-11400Intel $145Bench 94%, 24,459 samples | 256x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 3060Nvidia $290Bench 100%, 301,333 samples | 339x |
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $300Bench 128%, 394,994 samples | 156x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 136x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $420 |