Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (1st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 99 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	2.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

13 months ago, 13 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6600U 31,982 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 5.3 2-Core 10.6 4% 7.95 Pts	4-Core 15.4 8-Core 15.6 2% 15.5 Pts	64-Core 17.3 1% 17.3 Pts
Poor: 18% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 0014) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9416 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	2.47% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 3 2% 2.77 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 4.1 3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.47% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTN512HDJH-00000 512GB 100 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 385GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT2107Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 148 64 108 94 88 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.2% Very poor	Read 186 Write 181 Mixed 155 SusWrite 107 35% 157 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 5.1 16% 4.97 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB 10,651 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	9.62% Terrible	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 4.7 11% 3.77 GB/s	SC Read 1.1 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.67 GB/s	Latency 870 5% 870 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 9.62% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	64x
GeForce 930MNvidiaBench 8%, 4,490 samples	4x

SSD
THNSNK256GVN8 256GBToshibaBench 64%, 2,371 samples	11x
MZNTY256HDHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 87%, 2,168 samples	9x
MZNLN512HCJH-00000 512GBSamsungBench 87%, 322 samples	5x

RAM
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	11x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	8x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	6x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16