Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	40.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory	14 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201126
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '23 at 12:36
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 23,588 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Memory 66 1-Core 117 2-Core 206 72% 130 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 472 53% 414 Pts	64-Core 480 30% 480 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 1AB1) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3141 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.6% Average	Lighting 52.1 Reflection 58.3 Parallax 47.7 42% 52.7 fps	MRender 41.8 Gravity 47.1 Splatting 45.9 37% 44.9 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2200V_MTF 512GB 896 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 226GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1MA0V4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 871 988 728 230 624 817 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	139% Outstanding	Read 898 Write 1,001 Mixed 879 SusWrite 710 197% 872 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 56.9 4K Mixed 38.3 128% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 460 DQ Write 444 DQ Mixed 533 378% 479 MB/s
Poor: 115% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 178%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$89 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 115GB free Firmware: SVT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3655 Write 2,128 Mixed 2,805 634% 2,862 MB/s	4K Read 360 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 182 865% 235 MB/s	DQ Read 715 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 517 385% 521 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 137%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK Kingston KF2666C15S4/16G 24GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.8% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 13.7 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 8.5 27% 9.33 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 77%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,087x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,053x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	759x
Micron_2200V_MTF 512GBNvmeBench 152%, 896 samples	333x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	213x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	561x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	304x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	107x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16