MSI MEG Z690 ACE (MS-7D27)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 121%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive	476% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

13 months ago, 13 months ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7D27
Motherboard	MSI MEG Z690 ACE (MS-7D27) (all builds)
Memory	52.6 GB free of 64 GB
Display	5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220707
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '23 at 09:34
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-12900KS-$349 7,188 User benchmarks, average bench 119% U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	121% Outstanding	Memory 82.1 1-Core 218 2-Core 436 126% 246 Pts	4-Core 854 8-Core 1,462 140% 1,158 Pts	64-Core 2928 181% 2928 Pts
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 128%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-Ti 16,406 User benchmarks, average bench 232% Asus(1043 8874) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.41 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 332 Reflection 306 Parallax 352 271% 330 fps	Gravity 316 Splatting 210 226% 263 fps
Poor: 205% Great: 247%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP4000GM30013 4TB 649 User benchmarks, average bench 494% 681GB free (System drive) Firmware: SU6SM001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3648 4167 3374 1306 1453 1356 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	476% Outstanding	Read 2,767 Write 4,524 Mixed 3,063 SusWrite 2,551 731% 3,226 MB/s	4K Read 80.4 4K Write 309 4K Mixed 126 446% 172 MB/s	DQ Read 1876 DQ Write 1,345 DQ Mixed 1,644 1,219% 1,622 MB/s
Poor: 300% ↑ This bench: 476% Great: 624%
Samsung PSSD T7 Shield 2TB 153 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 172GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 734 754 756 755 750 722 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 82%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 1.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 149 145 146 150 148 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	83% Excellent	Read 143 Write 145 Mixed 65.9 SusWrite 146 91% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMT32GX5M2X6200C36 4x16GB 709 User benchmarks, average bench 173% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6200 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	206% Outstanding	MC Read 85.4 MC Write 82.6 MC Mixed 79 235% 82.3 GB/s	SC Read 24.6 SC Write 46.8 SC Mixed 36.1 102% 35.8 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 206% Great: 210%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MEG Z690 ACE (MS-7D27) Builds (Compare 674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 239%

UFO

Desktop 116%

UFO

Workstation 280%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG Z690 ACE (MS-7D27)

CPU
Core i9-12900KIntel $330Bench 117%, 66,991 samples	242x
Core i9-12900KSIntel $349Bench 119%, 7,188 samples	87x
Core i9-13900KIntel $518Bench 129%, 49,132 samples	71x

GPU
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	116x
RTX 3090-TiNvidiaBench 232%, 16,406 samples	93x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	87x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	99x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	71x
WDS200T1X0E-00AFY0 2TBBench 437%, 13,468 samples	31x

RAM
Skill Intl F5-6000J3636F162x16GBGBench 172%, 21,264 samples	38x
CMT32GX5M2X6200C36 2x16GBCorsairBench 181%, 4,737 samples	34x
Skill Intl F5-6400J3239G162x16GBGBench 186%, 14,947 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,804

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16