MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	70.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 12 months ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B79
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) (all builds)
Memory	26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220727
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '23 at 23:13
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$99 3,830 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 76.8 1-Core 149 2-Core 300 93% 175 Pts	4-Core 520 8-Core 821 83% 670 Pts	64-Core 1,080 67% 1,080 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT 4,246 User benchmarks, average bench 110% MSI(1462 5027) ≥ 4GB Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.3.2 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.7% Very good	Lighting 59.9 Reflection 59.9 Parallax 242 49% 120 fps	MRender 67.9 Gravity 127 Splatting 193 113% 129 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 116%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Scorch M2 512GB 2,054 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FM12.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 554 577 298 116 139 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 535 Write 778 Mixed 643 SusWrite 348 130% 576 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 58.8 4K Mixed 44.6 142% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 738 DQ Write 607 DQ Mixed 492 417% 612 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 164%
Seagate ST4000NE001-2MA101 4TB 145 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2TB free Firmware: EN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 212 213 226 224 221 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 105%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 955GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 98 100 98 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 103 Write 89.5 Mixed 50.4 SusWrite 98.8 63% 85.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 191 191 193 195 198 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Read 109 Write 118 Mixed 71.7 SusWrite 193 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 106%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 694GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 145 148 149 148 151 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 89.8 Write 70.9 Mixed 70.4 SusWrite 147 70% 94.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 4x8GB 3,708 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	MC Read 35.6 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 31.1 95% 33.4 GB/s	SC Read 24.3 SC Write 37.9 SC Mixed 28.9 87% 30.4 GB/s	Latency 86.6 46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,906 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,392x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	683x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $152Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	328x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	283x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	280x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	272x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	131x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	121x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	121x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	366x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	155x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	146x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $487

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)