| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5E-VM HDMI (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100326 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 25 '23 at 08:45 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 92% |
PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
|
35.2%
Below average
|
32% 47.7 Pts
|
11% 81.7 Pts
|
5% 86.3 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
|
13.4%
Very poor
|
14% 16.7 fps
|
13% 15.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 78 83 85 94 MB/s
|
34.1%
Below average
|
29% 129 MB/s
|
50% 16.6 MB/s
|
76% 112 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
1TB free
Firmware: MJAOA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 105 110 105 113 118 MB/s
|
64.9%
Good
|
69% 95.1 MB/s
|
154% 1.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
14.6%
Very poor
|
14% 4.77 GB/s
|
10% 3.5 GB/s
|
29% 136 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5E-VM HDMI Builds (Compare 40 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5E-VM HDMI
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 8x |
| Core2 Quad Q9500IntelBench 48%, 5,111 samples | 4x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 9x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 4x |
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $117 |