Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	24.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110 18,841 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Memory 55.6 1-Core 47.8 2-Core 62.7 36% 55.4 Pts	4-Core 64.5 8-Core 70.7 9% 67.6 Pts	64-Core 69.4 4% 69.4 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670 32,193 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sapphire(174B E247) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	5.07% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 6.6 Parallax 6.8 5% 6.63 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 6.4 Splatting 5.6 5% 5.63 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.07% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Twinmos SSD 256GB 933 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: U1124A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 80 92 13 63 67 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.5% Poor	Read 152 Write 116 Mixed 134 SusWrite 57.7 26% 115 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 21 4K Mixed 8.4 42% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 31.1 DQ Write 81.5 DQ Mixed 18.9 25% 43.8 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 237%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 49GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 90 99 101 97 105 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 99.9 Write 100 Mixed 59.9 SusWrite 97.7 66% 89.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	16.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 5.7 15% 5.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 2.5 13% 4.53 GB/s	Latency 141 28% 141 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16