HP ZBook Studio x360 G5

Performance Results

Gaming 65%
Desktop 74%
Workstation 59%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics97.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ZBook Studio x360 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 844F
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '23 at 18:18
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 51.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 234
70% 135 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 591
65% 513 Pts
64-Core 735
46% 735 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 12FE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.1% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 100
Parallax 116
96% 112 fps
MRender 156
Gravity 118
Splatting 98.3
99% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 112%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 844F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 7
Parallax 7.4
5% 6.9 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 11.8
7% 8.33 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$33
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 423 421 350 333 321 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 993
Write 546
Mixed 391
SusWrite 379
128% 577 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 36.3
124% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 802
DQ Write 468
DQ Mixed 243
286% 505 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 129%
Great: 216%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
438GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1275 1361 939 355 360 397 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 1,260
Write 1,537
Mixed 1,236
SusWrite 781
271% 1,203 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 55.9
178% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 883
DQ Write 623
DQ Mixed 759
565% 755 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 187%
Great: 365%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 13.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Studio x360 G5 Builds (Compare 439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 23%
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 21%

System: HP ZBook Studio x360 G5

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback