Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	19.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150820
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '23 at 15:57
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 1,918 User benchmarks, average bench 75% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 86.8 1-Core 106 2-Core 194 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 504 51% 412 Pts	64-Core 511 32% 511 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.3.1 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.3% Average	Lighting 58.1 Reflection 59.1 Parallax 79.4 47% 65.5 fps	MRender 59.5 Gravity 64.1 Splatting 43 44% 55.5 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Emtec X150 480GB 1,954 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 278GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 372 117 94 88 82 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Read 460 Write 397 Mixed 328 SusWrite 190 77% 344 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 70 4K Mixed 37.5 136% 46.9 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 214 187% 276 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 99%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 856GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 101 102 102 104 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 98.8 Write 95.3 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 102 64% 86.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-1600C11-8GIS Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G LO8G1600CL11 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 24GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57.6% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 16.6 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 19.2 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B85M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H - $76

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	504x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	495x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	474x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	473x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	226x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	224x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	154x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	115x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	114x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	68x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	58x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	50x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $313

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16