Performance Results


Gaming 112% UFO	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4-CB (all builds)
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190808
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '23 at 19:18
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	99.2% Outstanding	Memory 92.5 1-Core 143 2-Core 285 96% 174 Pts	4-Core 569 8-Core 930 92% 750 Pts	64-Core 996 62% 996 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 99.2% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% MSI(1462 C729) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (142 fps cap detected)	110% Outstanding	Lighting 142 Reflection 142 Parallax 142 116% 142 fps	MRender 142 Gravity 133 Splatting 118 106% 131 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$36 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 3.8 92 71 26 4.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	31% Below average	Read 319 Write 89 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 42.9 25% 115 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 23.7 4K Mixed 6.8 43% 14.9 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 27.6 DQ Mixed 42.7 39% 62.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 55%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 557GB free Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1581 1606 1560 1740 1866 1621 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	291% Outstanding	Read 1,861 Write 1,728 Mixed 1,704 SusWrite 1,662 392% 1,739 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 60.9 4K Mixed 49.1 158% 50.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,652 DQ Write 1,322 DQ Mixed 1,488 1,113% 1,487 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 291% Great: 488%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 130 126 126 125 133 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 83.7 Write 76.3 Mixed 65.9 SusWrite 126 65% 88 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0 57% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 3000 4x8GB 2,084 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	MC Read 32.4 MC Write 36.8 MC Mixed 28.8 93% 32.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.8 SC Write 41.4 SC Mixed 26.3 83% 29.2 GB/s	Latency 63.1 63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 101%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 98%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	356x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	349x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	119x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	223x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	131x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $36Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	76x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 14,178 samples	132x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 82%, 74,390 samples	94x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	71x

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $526

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16