Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1840-$69 7,524 User benchmarks, average bench 49% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Memory 49.9 1-Core 66.4 2-Core 94.2 42% 70.2 Pts	4-Core 105 8-Core 102 14% 104 Pts	64-Core 108 7% 108 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K420 3,707 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 1106) 1GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.29% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 5.2 Parallax 4.3 3% 4.43 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 4.6 4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.29% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB 11,312 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0809 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 151 151 174 187 197 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Read 291 Write 173 Mixed 196 SusWrite 169 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 32.6 4K Mixed 12.6 53% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 56.6 61% 102 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Kingmax FLFF65F-D8KQ9 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 13.3 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 12.5 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 161 25% 161 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	143x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	27x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	12x

RAM
ACR16D3LU1MNG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 458 samples	13x
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 51%, 8,612 samples	8x
ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 2,425 samples	8x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $223

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16