Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 71% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	92.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210710
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '23 at 00:19
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Memory 89.1 1-Core 121 2-Core 240 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 478 8-Core 658 72% 568 Pts	64-Core 664 41% 664 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.29 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 111 Parallax 114 95% 114 fps	MRender 139 Gravity 101 Splatting 93.3 89% 111 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 256GB 9,539 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: V9002s85 SusWrite @10s intervals: 661 681 520 333 150 102 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	142% Outstanding	Read 1,360 Write 611 Mixed 658 SusWrite 408 168% 759 MB/s	4K Read 34.6 4K Write 70.4 4K Mixed 40.3 141% 48.4 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 481 DQ Mixed 462 337% 435 MB/s
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 228%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 370GB free Firmware: 13057113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 69 70 70 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 166 Write 84 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 69.7 72% 97.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2666 2x8GB 4,790 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 21.8 78% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 23.6 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	544x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	225x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	117x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	134x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	116x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	90x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	161x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	69x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	57x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	96x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	69x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $263

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16