Acer Aspire M3910

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	67.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago.

System	Acer Aspire M3910 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire M3910
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100517
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '23 at 18:00
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 91.5 1-Core 66.8 2-Core 144 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 238 8-Core 247 32% 242 Pts	64-Core 266 16% 266 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX A2000 1,586 User benchmarks, average bench 70% Nvidia(10DE 151D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.7% Good	Lighting 83.2 Reflection 90.9 Parallax 0.1 68% 58.1 fps	MRender 104 Gravity 70 Splatting 76.7 67% 83.6 fps
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 74%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 3 Write 101 Mixed 6 8% 36.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.3 1% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Seagate ST9500325ASG 500GB 1,245 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 138GB free Firmware: 0009APM1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 39.9 Write 50.2 Mixed 31.1 30% 40.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 44%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 254GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 70.1 Write 70.4 Mixed 55.9 49% 65.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 29GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 24.5 Write 12.7 Mixed 16.4 21% 17.9 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1 73% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 22,320 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.8% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 12.7 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 11.1 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 65 62% 65 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M3910 Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3910

CPU
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples	62x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	49x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	28x

GPU
GeForce 315NvidiaBench 2%, 2,008 samples	20x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	13x
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples	13x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x

RAM
M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBUnknownBench 29%, 785 samples	5x
CT51264BD160B.C16F 4x4GBCrucialBench 50%, 640 samples	4x
GU512303EP0202 2x2GBUnknownBench 27%, 1,099 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $138

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16