PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 39% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C08 |
Motherboard | MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08) (all builds) |
Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 11 |
BIOS Date | 20211116 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 19 '23 at 16:54 |
Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
92.6%
Outstanding
|
82% 139 Pts
|
81% 660 Pts
|
64% 1,026 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD RX 480-$150
MSI(1462 809E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.3.1
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39%
Below average
|
37% 59 fps
|
42% 53.2 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 400 392 391 407 379 MB/s
|
110%
Outstanding
|
101% 447 MB/s
|
184% 67 MB/s
|
126% 182 MB/s
|
![]() SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$20
223GB free
Firmware: U21010RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 395 392 410 411 398 MB/s
|
80%
Very good
|
88% 392 MB/s
|
102% 36.1 MB/s
|
86% 124 MB/s
|
![]() Asmedia AS2115 1TB
657GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 25 26 26 25 MB/s
|
38%
Below average
|
33% 44.5 MB/s
|
230% 1.43 MB/s
|
|
![]() PNY USB 3.0 FD 137GB
116GB free, PID 0095
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 142 140 147 146 143 MB/s
|
59.3%
Above average
|
195% 150 MB/s
|
5% 0.43 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR2 859B CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD2 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
73.7%
Very good
|
73% 25.7 GB/s
|
67% 23.6 GB/s
|
61% 65.6 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 71 | 59 | 60 | 27" | 1920 1057 | AUS27C0 ASUS VZ279 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $123Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,025x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $90Bench 81%, 18,728 samples | 373x |
Core i5-8400Intel $172Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 271x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $225Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 324x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 279x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $120Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 223x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 99% - Outstanding | Total price: $348 |