Skikk ASGARD 15 II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemSkikk ASGARD 15 II  (all builds)
MotherboardSKIKK.EU ASGARD 15 II - RTX 3060
Memory18.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '23 at 15:18
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 67.6
1-Core 188
2-Core 358
106% 205 Pts
4-Core 608
8-Core 959
96% 783 Pts
64-Core 1,483
92% 1,483 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 102%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Clevo(1558 65F5) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 29.6
Parallax 29.3
20% 27.8 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 21.7
22% 27 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 21%
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 65F5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.7% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 127
Parallax 135
106% 130 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 97.2
Splatting 84.3
85% 108 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$85
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,280
Write 1,347
Mixed 888
330% 1,505 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 61.7
248% 95.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,291
DQ Write 782
DQ Mixed 896
705% 990 MB/s
Poor: 206% Great: 442%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
643GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,655
Write 1,991
Mixed 1,698
400% 1,782 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 93.2
319% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,476
DQ Write 987
DQ Mixed 1,170
890% 1,211 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 365%
Generic MassStorageClass 64GB
31GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 80.6
Write 30.3
Mixed 18.4
44% 43.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.6
105% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C22-16GRS 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 36.8
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 36.5
SC Mixed 26.8
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASGARD 15 II Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO

System: Skikk ASGARD 15 II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback