Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	93.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	28% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131212
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '23 at 14:51
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	58%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$158 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	Memory 75.5 1-Core 49 2-Core 103 48% 75.8 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 324 29% 247 Pts	64-Core 319 20% 319 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$225 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Nvidia(10DE 1F08) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.49 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Lighting 119 Reflection 97.9 Parallax 100 97% 106 fps	MRender 128 Gravity 102 Splatting 92.4 86% 107 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
3 256GB SSD 256GB 1,104 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0330A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 112 109 79 49 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	28% Poor	Read 346 Write 319 Mixed 15.4 SusWrite 66.4 41% 187 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 16.2 4K Mixed 0.3 30% 10.2 MB/s	DQ Read 69.7 DQ Write 21.8 DQ Mixed 0.3 12% 30.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 92%
Kingston SA400S37/480G 480GB 110 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 256GB free Firmware: HPS2227P SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 145 205 293 284 250 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Read 352 Write 348 Mixed 288 SusWrite 224 68% 303 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 64.4 4K Mixed 10.3 82% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 216 DQ Mixed 16.4 59% 127 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown JHC1600U1108JY BLT8G3D1869DT1TX0. 16GB 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.7% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 14.6 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 11.3 27% 9.33 GB/s	Latency 89.3 45% 89.3 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 9: 0P 0R 1G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
9%	35%	20	326	29	75	23.8"	2048 1152	ACR066D Acer B247YU

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $170

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	360x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	330x
FX-8320AMD $158Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	174x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $120Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	92x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	58x
RX 570AMD $170Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	56x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $17Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	44x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $40Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	34x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	42x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $397

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $315	Nvidia RTX 3060 $330	Crucial MX500 250GB $31
Intel Core i5-12600K $194	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $420	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $140	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $830	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16