Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200901
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 19 '23 at 13:17
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$136
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 236
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 609
63% 506 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.50.26
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 33.8
18% 24.2 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 25.1
Splatting 15.5
15% 18.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 18%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$48
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 581 456 402 400 392 392 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 2,290
Write 2,061
Mixed 1,387
SusWrite 437
344% 1,544 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 70
223% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 924
DQ Write 462
DQ Mixed 730
532% 705 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 219%
Great: 302%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$57
420GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 438 436 440 383 404 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 430
Mixed 396
SusWrite 419
97% 429 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 47.1
158% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 309
249% 352 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 110%
Great: 125%
S3SSDD480 480GB
423GB free
Firmware: U0806A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1029 1082 1079 1083 1048 1018 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 1258
Write 1,000
Mixed 850
SusWrite 1,057
234% 1,041 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 24.7
169% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 887
DQ Write 631
DQ Mixed 466
427% 661 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 197%
Great: 239%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB
692GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 117 118 116 110 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 72.4
Write 95.9
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 114
66% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
113% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 66%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
438GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 93 93 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 138
Write 137
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 94
139% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.6
223% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
87% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 30.5
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 27.2
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 0 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II Builds (Compare 593 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $204
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $315Nvidia RTX 3060 $330Crucial MX500 250GB $31
Intel Core i5-12600K $194Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $420Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $140Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $830Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback