Seco C40

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSeco C40  (all builds)
MotherboardSeco C40
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200423
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 19 '23 at 13:04
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B Vega Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 154
56% 99 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 292
32% 253 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 69%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z44106 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1030 1056 862 624 374 322 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1453
Write 1,036
Mixed 964
SusWrite 712
232% 1,041 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 50.1
164% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 637
DQ Write 375
DQ Mixed 319
288% 444 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 175%
Great: 229%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 25.3
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 20
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 32 0" 1280 720
Typical C40 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Seco C40

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $50
The Best.
Intel Core i5-13600K $320Nvidia RTX 3060 $350Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-12600K $194Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $419Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $158Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $830Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback