Asus ROG STRIX X570-I GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive366% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-I GAMING  (all builds)
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200402
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 19 '23 at 13:04
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$539
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 69.3
1-Core 136
2-Core 272
85% 159 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 1,033
93% 784 Pts
64-Core 2,127
132% 2,127 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$350
Gigabyte(1458 4071) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.29
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 131
Reflection 115
Parallax 122
107% 123 fps
Gravity 100
Splatting 87.5
82% 93.8 fps
Poor: 91% Great: 106%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000S1024G 1TB
824GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2633 3015 1665 1553 1534 1027 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
366% Outstanding
Read 2,760
Write 3,912
Mixed 2,788
SusWrite 1,904
642% 2,841 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 94.4
302% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,231
DQ Write 758
DQ Mixed 1,021
754% 1,004 MB/s
Poor: 243%
This bench: 366%
Great: 604%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
726GB free
Firmware: RKT303.3 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1668 1076 1006 974 886 411 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1417
Write 2,227
Mixed 1,542
SusWrite 1,003
350% 1,547 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 61.1
202% 74.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,286
DQ Write 902
DQ Mixed 1,051
796% 1,080 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 229%
Great: 303%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$65
931GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 417 420 433 419 432 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 429
Write 397
Mixed 376
SusWrite 423
92% 406 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 49.5
155% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 185
139% 186 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 100%
Great: 137%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
721GB free
Firmware: SBK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 120 116 117 117 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64% Good
Read 107
Write 122
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 116
73% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 64%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
702GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 154 156 155 148 157 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 55.4
Write 102
Mixed 78.4
SusWrite 150
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
70.2% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 25.5
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 24
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 29 4 120 72.3" 1280 720 GSMC0C8 LG TV SSCR2
Typical ROG STRIX X570-I GAMING Builds (Compare 1,542 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 180%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-I GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,024
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320Nvidia RTX 3060 $350Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-12600K $194Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $420Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $158Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $830Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback