Clevo Modified by dsanke

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemClevo Modified by dsanke  (all builds)
MotherboardClevo P870KM
Memory45.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '23 at 13:04
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 290
95% 174 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 875
90% 726 Pts
64-Core 1,075
67% 1,075 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 087A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 66% Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
834GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1111 1207 1543 1579 1606 1578 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 1,647
Write 802
Mixed 1,325
SusWrite 1,437
292% 1,303 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 61.9
197% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 869
DQ Write 681
DQ Mixed 659
525% 736 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 250%
Great: 370%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 211 208 203 203 210 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23% Poor
Read 181
Write 136
Mixed 101
SusWrite 204
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 1.2
11% 5.6 MB/s
DQ Read 4.1
DQ Write 6.9
DQ Mixed 2.9
3% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 23%
Great: 565%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$114
954GB free
Firmware: 03.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1435 1456 902 919 890 936 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 896
Write 1,037
Mixed 704
SusWrite 1,090
210% 931 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 28.1
112% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 60
DQ Write 752
DQ Mixed 71.6
155% 294 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 155%
Great: 306%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 3x16GB
3 of 4 slots used
48GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
64.5% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 21.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 23.5
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Modified by dsanke Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 77%

System: Clevo Modified by dsanke

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $221
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback