PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4 (all builds) |
Memory | 3 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100128 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 19 '23 at 12:41 |
Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 31% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i5-750-$122
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
64.2%
Good
|
58% 92.5 Pts
|
30% 223 Pts
|
16% 253 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$120
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.29
|
32.8%
Below average
|
35% 42.7 fps
|
29% 36.5 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$65
879GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 48 54 56 55 56 MB/s
|
36.2%
Below average
|
20% 87.8 MB/s
|
79% 26.4 MB/s
|
55% 74.4 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
476GB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 59 59 58 57 57 MB/s
|
45%
Average
|
28% 124 MB/s
|
99% 31.1 MB/s
|
55% 74.1 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 155 157 161 151 153 MB/s
|
87.2%
Excellent
|
90% 123 MB/s
|
154% 1.1 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD Elements 1078 750GB
512GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 91 92 95 94 95 MB/s
|
38%
Below average
|
108% 79 MB/s
|
100% 1.13 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown 14GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
25.4%
Poor
|
21% 7.47 GB/s
|
24% 8.43 GB/s
|
61% 65.8 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 63 | 50 | 50 | 27" | 1280 720 | HWP3325 HP 27es |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i7 860Intel $270Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 48x |
Core i5-750Intel $122Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 37x |
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 30x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $120Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 23x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $80Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 12x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $130Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $528 |