Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	67.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '23 at 11:39
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 57,853 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Memory 48 1-Core 89.9 2-Core 128 51% 88.5 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 255 27% 216 Pts	64-Core 294 18% 294 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Asus(1043 10AF) ≥ 4GB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.9% Good	Lighting 85.8 Reflection 88.2 Parallax 77.2 70% 83.7 fps	MRender 91.6 Gravity 77.1 Splatting 69.8 64% 79.5 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 72%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB 29,713 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 439GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1MA0V4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 950 967 975 1006 1017 1015 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	158% Outstanding	Read 988 Write 1,024 Mixed 940 SusWrite 988 222% 985 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 37.7 123% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 463 DQ Write 419 DQ Mixed 418 320% 433 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 158% Great: 181%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GB 42,443 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	58.8% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 22.5 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 14 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	120	15.5"	1536 864	AUOD0ED

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU Builds (Compare 460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

CPU
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	415x
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	249x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	186x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	24x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $67Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	145x
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	128x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	47x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples	59x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	44x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $67

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $315	Nvidia RTX 3060 $330	Crucial MX500 250GB $31
Intel Core i5-12600K $194	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $420	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $140	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $830	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16