PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z620 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 158A |
Memory | 44.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140325 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 19 '23 at 11:38 |
Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 12% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
64.5%
Good
|
66% 114 Pts
|
42% 340 Pts
|
26% 416 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD RX 580-$193
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.3.1
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.6%
Above average
|
52% 71 fps
|
49% 61.2 fps
|
|
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$65
876GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 231 229 243 244 244 MB/s
|
75.5%
Very good
|
54% 242 MB/s
|
136% 44.3 MB/s
|
147% 196 MB/s
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
71.3%
Very good
|
78% 27.3 GB/s
|
37% 13 GB/s
|
48% 84.1 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 59 | 39 | 50 | 84.6" | 1280 720 | TSB3700 50UHD_LCD_TV |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 115x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 107x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 91x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 114x |
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 80x |
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 79x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $420 |