Asus CM6330_CM6630_CM6730_CM6830-8

Performance Results

Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop 78%
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus CM6330_CM6630_CM6730_CM6830-8  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6330_CM6630_CM6730_CM6830
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '23 at 04:37
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$93
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 91
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 185
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 312
39% 295 Pts
64-Core 314
20% 314 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
EVGA(3842 2888) 3GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.3% Good
Lighting 72.3
Reflection 75.1
Parallax 95.2
59% 80.9 fps
MRender 83.2
Gravity 86.6
Splatting 65.4
63% 78.4 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGS31-500GS-2 500GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 186 189 197 202 196 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 332
Write 313
Mixed 280
SusWrite 182
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 30.5
96% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 226
169% 225 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 109%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
435GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 167 176 178 170 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 178
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 164
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMY32GX3M4A1600C9 04EF Dark-1600 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.9
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6330_CM6630_CM6730_CM6830-8 Builds (Compare 140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop 64%
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6330_CM6630_CM6730_CM6830-8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback