Biostar H61MLC

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago.

Motherboard	Biostar H61MLC (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120502
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '23 at 03:06
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	65.8% Good	Memory 89.1 1-Core 75.3 2-Core 150 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 278 34% 260 Pts	64-Core 187 12% 187 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 531.29 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.8% Above average	Lighting 63.9 Reflection 66.4 Parallax 62.2 52% 64.2 fps	MRender 64.5 Gravity 64 Splatting 59.9 51% 62.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 33 52 77 32 41 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.3% Below average	Read 176 Write 97.3 Mixed 129 SusWrite 55.5 26% 114 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 32.8 4K Mixed 16.2 58% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 21.6 DQ Write 66.5 DQ Mixed 26.9 26% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 378GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 163 151 157 153 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 167 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 152 95% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB Kingston 9905471-079.A00LF 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.8% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 17.1 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 11.3 SC Mixed 14.6 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61MLC Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MLC

CPU
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	8x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	7x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	5x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	8x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	4x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	3x

SSD
AS350 128GBApacerBench 65%, 2,222 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x

RAM
CT51264BD160B.C16F 8GBUnknownBench 42%, 173 samples	3x
TMS4GB364E081139PE Kingston 99U5402-034.A00LF 8GBUnknownBench 49%, 4 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $49

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16