MSI A320I-S01 (MS-7A40)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 month ago, 2 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 23 days ago, 21 days ago, 21 days ago, 20 days ago, 19 days ago, 19 days ago, 15 days ago, 14 days ago, 12 days ago, 11 days ago, 11 days ago, 11 days ago, 11 days ago, 8 days ago, 6 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A40
MotherboardMSI A320I-S01 (MS-7A40)  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200707
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMar 18 '23 at 22:22
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$82
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 66.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 222
72% 133 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 392
50% 378 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
MSI(1462 7A40) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 21.8
13% 17.6 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 17.8
Splatting 14
12% 14.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 13%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Team T253X5480G 480GB
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1230A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 10 131 76 76 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 478
Write 428
Mixed 405
SusWrite 85
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 28.2
124% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 46.5
93% 182 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.1% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 26.3
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 22.3
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 18.5" 1280 720 VIZ0067 M190VA
Typical A320I-S01 (MS-7A40) Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A320I-S01 (MS-7A40)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $104
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320Nvidia RTX 3060 $350Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-12400F $150Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $419Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12600K $194Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $800Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback