MSI H110M ECO (MS-7994)

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	64.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	MSI MS-7994
Motherboard	MSI H110M ECO (MS-7994) (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170720
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 27 '17 at 17:27
Run Duration	677 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600-$132 80,688 User benchmarks, average bench 68% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Memory 91.1 1-Core 116 2-Core 232 83% 146 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 417 55% 414 Pts	64-Core 448 28% 448 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3716) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Lighting 81.8 Reflection 79.7 Parallax 76.7 67% 79.4 fps	MRender 72.8 Gravity 73.5 Splatting 72.6 60% 73 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 564 (05) Reallocated sector count 97 97 24 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8271 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 542 (64) Unknown 100 100 14070080 (65) Unknown 100 100 1648272 (AA) Unknown 100 100 24 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 202 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 72 72 8455 (B2) Unknown 100 100 4 (B4) Unknown 100 100 700 (B7) Unknown 93 93 77 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 244 (C2) HDA temperature 30 100 180389871646 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 564 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 24 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 320 (E7) Temperature 79 79 21 (E9) Unknown 100 100 26041 (EA) Unknown 100 100 9380 (F1) Unknown 100 100 19673 (F2) Unknown 100 100 27371 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 347	64% Good	Read 488 Write 170 Mixed 222 64% 293 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 12.6 88% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 281 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 18.3 62% 140 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 82%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB 9,937 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 945GB free Firmware: 04.05G09 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 140 137 9966 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3426 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8281 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 602 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 91 327738 (BE) vendor-specific 63 50 37 (BF) G-sense error rate 78 78 22 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 152 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3273 (C2) HDA temperature 115 102 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 24 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	49% Average	Read 119 Write 51.7 Mixed 50.8 55% 73.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 2.83 4K Mixed 0.49 136% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2GB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 229086096 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1579 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 46743917 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5483 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 350 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BE) vendor-specific 66 57 571801634 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 63 63 75535 (C2) HDA temperature 34 43 77309411362 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -652835026572 (F1) Unknown 100 253 22379433785 (F2) Unknown 100 253 184170063614	95.2% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 159 Mixed 184 130% 172 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.2 83% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 114%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 5TB 1,185 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 964GB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 109 Write 124 Mixed 110 149% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.08 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.05 39% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 81%
TDK LoR TF10 16GB 1,169 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 11GB free, PID 0619 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	5.79% Terrible	Read 13.8 Write 6.86 Mixed 5.03 9% 8.55 MB/s	4K Read 3.16 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.34 40% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.79% Great: 10%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 16GB 5,753 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 5GB free, PID 557d Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 34.2 Write 6.98 Mixed 11.4 17% 17.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.79 94% 2.14 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 17%
TDK LoR TF10 32GB 163 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 4GB free, PID 070a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 34 Write 9.54 Mixed 15 21% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.32 4K Write 0.82 4K Mixed 0.05 57% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-062.A00G 9905625-029.A00G 16GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	75.9% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 24.9 77% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 23.3 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M ECO (MS-7994) Builds (Compare 869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M ECO (MS-7994)

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	181x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	91x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	72x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	130x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	94x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	58x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	38x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x

RAM
Value DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 68%, 7,794 samples	20x
CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 1x8GBCrucialBench 40%, 5,207 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $198

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16