HP ProLiant ML350 Gen9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProLiant ML350 Gen9  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory69.6 GB free of 80 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150506
Uptime16.8 Days
Run DateNov 27 '17 at 12:08
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 39.3
2-Core 89
40% 63.5 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 386
32% 275 Pts
64-Core 577
36% 577 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 3.5TB
984GB free
Firmware: 2.52
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 69% Great: 81%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 1TB
437GB free
Firmware: 2.52
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 93%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 147GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.52
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 752369-081 752368-081 752368-081 752368-081 752368-081 752368-081 752368-081 752368-081 752368-081 80GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.5% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 27.6
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 11.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML350 Gen9 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant ML350 Gen9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback