Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+ 5,400 User benchmarks, average bench 37% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Memory 33.5 1-Core 23.6 2-Core 31.9 20% 29.7 Pts	4-Core 41.4 8-Core 45 6% 43.2 Pts	64-Core 45.7 3% 45.7 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670 21,442 User benchmarks, average bench 4% MSI(1462 1620) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	2.89% Terrible	Lighting 3.3 Reflection 5 Parallax 2.2 3% 3.5 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 5.9 3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.89% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605ABBF2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 89 99 87 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 119 Write 134 Mixed 128 SusWrite 95.8 27% 119 MB/s	4K Read 9.9 4K Write 21.5 4K Mixed 11.6 41% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 88.6 DQ Write 91.6 DQ Mixed 83.7 65% 88 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	12.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.53 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 2.4 8% 2.93 GB/s	Latency 235 17% 235 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 940AMDBench 49%, 3,675 samples	2x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	1x
HD 7870AMD $203Bench 26%, 42,130 samples	1x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x

SSD
530 Series 120GBIntel $79Bench 67%, 15,015 samples	1x
MX300 275GBCrucial $100Bench 79%, 67,541 samples	1x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	1x

Value: 6% - Terrible

Total price: $79

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16