Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Memory 51 1-Core 63.2 2-Core 111 44% 75.2 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 184 25% 186 Pts	64-Core 148 9% 148 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Gigabyte(1458 230A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1189 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Lighting 23.5 Reflection 25.7 Parallax 33.2 19% 27.5 fps	MRender 26.2 Gravity 27.3 Splatting 19.9 20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 25%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 273GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3H01103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 243 318 385 409 354 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	57.3% Above average	Read 332 Write 241 Mixed 270 SusWrite 303 64% 286 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 25.8 4K Mixed 14.8 60% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 57.2 72% 128 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB 4,786 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	33.5% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 13.5 36% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 9.4 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 157 26% 157 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	148x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	68x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 39%, 4,786 samples	61x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $366

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16