Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 371%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 365%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics368% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive426% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory51.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 12 '23 at 13:32
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$15
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 168
2-Core 324
106% 195 Pts
4-Core 636
8-Core 1,077
104% 857 Pts
64-Core 1,532
95% 1,532 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,800
Zotac(19DA 4675) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
368% Outstanding
Lighting 563
Reflection 615
Parallax 798
459% 659 fps
MRender 554
Gravity 610
Splatting 318
387% 494 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 368%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$168
682GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2787 2994 3038 1928 1623 1624 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
426% Outstanding
Read 2,995
Write 3,320
Mixed 3,008
SusWrite 2,332
657% 2,914 MB/s
4K Read 78.4
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 109
362% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,255
DQ Write 1,029
DQ Mixed 1119
844% 1,134 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 426%
Great: 526%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$168
410GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2306 2787 1823 1708 1705 1701 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
394% Outstanding
Read 2,864
Write 3,311
Mixed 2984
SusWrite 2,005
630% 2791 MB/s
4K Read 71
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 102
329% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,346
DQ Write 1,080
DQ Mixed 1,199
901% 1,208 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 394%
Great: 526%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55
232GB free
Firmware: MAT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 13,225
Write 8,595
Mixed 10,100
2,358% 10,640 MB/s
4K Read 679
4K Write 509
4K Mixed 85.7
1,408% 425 MB/s
DQ Read 705
DQ Write 1,106
DQ Mixed 1160
807% 990 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
341GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 158 162 162 163 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 112
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 162
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G36C16U4B.M8FB1 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
104% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 39.7
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 33.5
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 41.2
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 104%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback