Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 20% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	11% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X3 445-$100 3,101 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Memory 60.5 1-Core 36.5 2-Core 82 38% 59.7 Pts	4-Core 101 8-Core 99.6 13% 100 Pts	64-Core 100 6% 100 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670 18,196 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sapphire(174B E166) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	5.64% Terrible	Lighting 6.9 Reflection 5.9 Parallax 6 6% 6.27 fps	MRender 8.1 Gravity 5.2 Splatting 7.4 6% 6.9 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.64% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 32 3.4 0.6 22 39 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	11% Very poor	Read 112 Write 55.3 Mixed 56.1 SusWrite 24.2 14% 62 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 3.3 17% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-173.A00LF 1x2GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 6.3 20% 7.03 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 2.8 13% 4.67 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x4GBKingstonBench 27%, 3,879 samples	3x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	1x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $220

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16