Lenovo 82JU

Performance Results

Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82JU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '23 at 23:06
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 79.1
1-Core 150
2-Core 298
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 765
82% 654 Pts
64-Core 965
60% 965 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3A81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 125
Parallax 125
108% 127 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 103
Splatting 86.9
87% 109 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L2 512GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L1QEXF7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,239
Write 1,157
Mixed 1,708
376% 1,701 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 78
254% 86.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,083
DQ Write 867
DQ Mixed 969
727% 973 MB/s
Poor: 156% Great: 296%
Intel 670p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$550
2TB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2129 2020 2088 2023 2072 2070 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
360% Outstanding
Read 2,585
Write 2,122
Mixed 1,520
SusWrite 2,067
465% 2,073 MB/s
4K Read 62.2
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 83
274% 94.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,112
DQ Write 933
DQ Mixed 742
632% 929 MB/s
Poor: 201%
This bench: 360%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
73.4% Very good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 26.3
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 25
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 28.9
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82JU Builds (Compare 5,354 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 71%
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

System: Lenovo 82JU

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback