Asus SABERTOOTH Z77

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics61% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z77  (all builds)
Memory20.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 25 '17 at 00:59
Run Duration315 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-3770K-$300
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
55.4% Above average
SC Int 94.2
SC Float 93
SC Mixed 91.8
74% 93 Pts
QC Int 257
QC Float 269
QC Mixed 228
57% 251 Pts
MC Int 393
MC Float 499
MC Mixed 585
73% 492 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$374
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
61% Good
Lighting 189
Reflection 164
Parallax 207
60% 186 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 169
Splatting 116
62% 142 fps
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61%
Great: 71%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 503
Write 470
Mixed 469
107% 481 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 22.8
90% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 78.4
DQ Mixed 38.9
45% 79.4 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 107
Write 120
Mixed 95.9
81% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.23
75% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 114%
ST4000DM 005-2DP166 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 140
Write 144
Mixed 113
169% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.28
78% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 69%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 143
Write 134
Mixed 126
170% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 2.55
4K Mixed 0.26
98% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 68%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.8% Above average
Read 135
Write 130
Mixed 109
158% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.25
84% 0.98 MB/s
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB
297GB free, PID ce17
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 41.7
Write 42.1
Mixed 35.1
51% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.32
57% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 19%
WDC WD20 02FAEX-007BA0 2TB
29GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 145
Write 118
Mixed 68.8
132% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 2.57
4K Mixed 0.45
106% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 15.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 71%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical SABERTOOTH Z77 Builds (Compare 6,698 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z77 - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $984
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $365Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $139Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $280Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $646SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $85SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback