HP Compaq nw9440 (EY612EA#ABB)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq nw9440 (EY612EA#ABB)  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 309F
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080711
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 24 '17 at 22:37
Run Duration96 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 T7400-$110
U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
35% Below average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 23.9
2-Core 46
32% 44.2 Pts
4-Core 44.9
8-Core 46.1
6% 45.5 Pts
64-Core 45.7
3% 45.7 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1500M
HP(103C 309F) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.16.11.9156
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.08
Parallax 0.47
2% 1.15 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.2% Below average
Read 132
Write 127
Mixed 131
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 16
65% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 21
DQ Write 37.7
DQ Mixed 26.1
21% 28.3 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback