Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 100% UFO	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171018
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '17 at 18:53
Run Duration	259 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	93%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Memory 76.3 1-Core 120 2-Core 240 80% 145 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 841 75% 634 Pts	64-Core 1,306 81% 1,306 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2775 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	126% Outstanding	Lighting 171 Reflection 207 Parallax 178 140% 186 fps	MRender 126 Gravity 181 Splatting 128 117% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 923GB free Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 301 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 91 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 20 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 62 58 180389806118 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 202698293 (F7) Unknown 100 100 6428046 (F8) Unknown 100 100 1468107 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4413 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	82.4% Excellent	Read 486 Write 349 Mixed 342 87% 392 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 66.3 4K Mixed 26.2 108% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 251 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 54.3 81% 154 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 105%
OCZ SOLID3 480GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 429GB free Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 2657041 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 127826816677018 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1028 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 107 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 2657041 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 2657041 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 2657041 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 24369 (EA) Unknown 0 0 16148 (F1) Unknown 0 0 16148 (F2) Unknown 0 0 22598	36% Below average	Read 253 Write 137 Mixed 141 39% 177 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 15 4K Mixed 11.4 46% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 42.9 DQ Mixed 28.7 35% 62.5 MB/s
Poor: 104% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 107%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 367GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	237% Outstanding	Read 2,187 Write 1,387 Mixed 1,229 353% 1,601 MB/s	4K Read 50.6 4K Write 87.3 4K Mixed 45.6 181% 61.2 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 103 105% 175 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 237% Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 341GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 301 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 92 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 55 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 13 (F1) Unknown 99 99 400091349	108% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 416 Mixed 420 100% 451 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 83.4 4K Mixed 45.4 164% 56.6 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 216 DQ Mixed 107 117% 196 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 134%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$79 15,506 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 924GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 153 150 1325 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 608 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 316 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 118 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 32 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1574 (C2) HDA temperature 114 98 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	122% Outstanding	Read 215 Write 211 Mixed 188 154% 205 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 4.37 4K Mixed 0.31 146% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 63%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50 12,013 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 924GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 193 162 1316 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 397 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 520 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 241 (BF) G-sense error rate 63 63 37 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 64 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1904 (C2) HDA temperature 108 96 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 296 (F1) Unknown 200 200 2230655960 (F2) Unknown 200 200 2205719102 (FE) Unknown 200 200 0	117% Outstanding	Read 206 Write 202 Mixed 185 149% 198 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 3.49 4K Mixed 0.52 153% 1.58 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 65%
Seagate BUP RD 4TB 117 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3TB free, PID ab28 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 94.4 Write 97.8 Mixed 71 111% 87.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.44 201% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 58%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB 196 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1.5TB free, PID ab26 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 110 Write 128 Mixed 64.6 128% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 3.39 4K Mixed 0.46 134% 1.56 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x16GB 119 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	79.8% Very good	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 25.7 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 20.5 SC Write 31.2 SC Mixed 26 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 87.8 46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)