Acer Predator PH315-54

Performance Results

Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive349% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-54  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL QX60_TLS
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220607
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '23 at 05:08
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 68
1-Core 159
2-Core 299
93% 175 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 957
89% 742 Pts
64-Core 1,383
86% 1,383 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.19% Terrible
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 156
Parallax 11.5
8% 59 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 10.2
9% 11 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.19%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7302Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3157 1721 925 927 922 925 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
349% Outstanding
Read 2,918
Write 3,187
Mixed 2,795
SusWrite 1,430
581% 2,582 MB/s
4K Read 74.2
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 104
335% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1016
DQ Write 803
DQ Mixed 895
674% 905 MB/s
Poor: 193%
This bench: 349%
Great: 388%
774GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 137 138 138 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 153
Write 134
Mixed 76.1
SusWrite 138
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 0.9
7% 3.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 14.5
DQ Mixed 0.3
2% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
2 of 8 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 16.7
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 15.1
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-54 Builds (Compare 3,768 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-54

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback