Asus PRIME Z390M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 months ago, 1 month ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME Z390M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210106
Uptime	14.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 09 '23 at 11:39
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	EST-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$417 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 97.6 1-Core 145 2-Core 289 98% 177 Pts	4-Core 575 8-Core 896 91% 736 Pts	64-Core 1,068 66% 1,068 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$130 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.7% Above average	Lighting 66 Reflection 71.9 Parallax 64.3 54% 67.4 fps	MRender 64 Gravity 68.7 Splatting 64 54% 65.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 60%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 241GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 595 471 472 474 472 474 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	249% Outstanding	Read 2,339 Write 2,142 Mixed 1416 SusWrite 493 356% 1,597 MB/s	4K Read 54.9 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 70.9 233% 79.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1316 DQ Write 1,076 DQ Mixed 1,171 884% 1,188 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 249% Great: 340%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB 2,584 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 40.9 MC Write 40.3 MC Mixed 29.2 105% 36.8 GB/s	SC Read 21.1 SC Write 39.1 SC Mixed 29.6 86% 29.9 GB/s	Latency 47.9 84% 47.9 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	60	24.1"	1920 1200	HPN3462 HP E243i

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME Z390M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 100%

UFO

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 84%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390M-PLUS

CPU
Core i5-9600KIntel $250Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	258x
Core i7-9700KIntel $417Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	255x
Core i9-9900KIntel $350Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	149x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $450Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	68x
RTX 2060Nvidia $225Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	66x
RTX 3070Nvidia $530Bench 148%, 562,666 samples	57x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $45Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	66x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $60Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	44x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $50Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	29x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	40x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	31x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $81Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $788

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320	Nvidia RTX 3060 $350	Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-12600K $194	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $420	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $800	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16