Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100311
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 09 '23 at 09:09
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 94.1 1-Core 87.9 2-Core 172 71% 118 Pts	4-Core 291 8-Core 390 43% 341 Pts	64-Core 407 25% 407 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% MSI(1462 8D95) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.37 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	59.5% Above average	Lighting 76.6 Reflection 77.1 Parallax 65.2 62% 73 fps	MRender 63.2 Gravity 74.3 Splatting 61 54% 66.2 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 101 98 93 95 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.9% Average	Read 198 Write 125 Mixed 149 SusWrite 96.1 32% 142 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 63.1 4K Mixed 31.9 110% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 24.6 DQ Write 67.4 DQ Mixed 27.4 26% 39.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 75%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 253GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 79 88 80 85 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.1% Above average	Read 242 Write 234 Mixed 221 SusWrite 78.6 44% 194 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 59.8 4K Mixed 41.4 134% 44.7 MB/s	DQ Read 32.8 DQ Write 74.6 DQ Mixed 48.1 38% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 129%
Kingston SSDNow KC300 60GB-$56 675 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 15GB free Firmware: 507KC4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 71 80 84 75 87 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.2% Below average	Read 144 Write 75.1 Mixed 109 SusWrite 77.4 23% 101 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 18.3 4K Mixed 21.3 62% 18.8 MB/s	DQ Read 24.9 DQ Write 13.6 DQ Mixed 16 13% 18.2 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 79%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 112GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 81 80 71 82 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.6% Poor	Read 121 Write 77.5 Mixed 64.9 SusWrite 75.1 19% 84.7 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 15.3 4K Mixed 6.8 36% 11.7 MB/s	DQ Read 8.1 DQ Write 14.3 DQ Mixed 10.6 8% 11 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 102%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 22GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 79 88 80 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Read 174 Write 109 Mixed 138 SusWrite 78.6 28% 125 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 15.4 69% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 17 DQ Write 75.2 DQ Mixed 23.8 25% 38.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 73%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 248GB free Firmware: ST6OA31B SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 80 80 70 82 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 83 Write 86.9 Mixed 48.1 SusWrite 75.1 54% 73.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	43.7% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 12.6 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 12.5 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 59.6 67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-EX58-UD3R Builds (Compare 479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R - $200

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	284x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	26x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	26x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	27x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	27x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	79x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	68x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	59x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $377

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16