Asrock Z390 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180829
Uptime10.2 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '23 at 07:44
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 59%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 230
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 556
63% 491 Pts
64-Core 579
36% 579 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 162
Parallax 151
142% 162 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 131
Splatting 113
111% 139 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 125%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 173 172 169 166 166 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 418
Write 215
Mixed 239
SusWrite 179
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 23
90% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 220
178% 257 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 133%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
117GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 201 244 246 216 285 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.4% Below average
Read 144
Write 94.3
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 243
32% 141 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 8.4
33% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 15.9
DQ Write 16.7
DQ Mixed 14.9
12% 15.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 100%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
187GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 188 187 197 192 196 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 301
Write 276
Mixed 260
SusWrite 199
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 27.6
92% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 164
131% 183 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32
504GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 152 152 154 155 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 168
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 153
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
170GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 155 157 156 158 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 174
Mixed 105
SusWrite 156
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
61.8% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 19.8
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,519 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Extreme4 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $731
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback