PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus H81-GAMER (all builds) |
Memory | 10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20141125 |
Uptime | 6.3 Days |
Run Date | Feb 09 '23 at 01:45 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
|
79.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.2%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 97 92 89 85 82 MB/s
|
88.4%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
144GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 137 135 136 135 137 MB/s
|
72.9%
Very good
|
|||
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB
590GB free
Firmware: 1201
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
55.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 184x |
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples | 93x |
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples | 80x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 76x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 57x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 54x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 46% - Average | Total price: $493 |