Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-12500H 11,588 User benchmarks, average bench 94% U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Memory 11.4 1-Core 174 2-Core 340 82% 175 Pts	4-Core 584 8-Core 823 88% 703 Pts	64-Core 1,271 79% 1,271 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 7,232 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3430 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.62% Terrible	Lighting 11.2 Reflection 17.3 Parallax 12.9 9% 13.8 fps	MRender 16.6 Gravity 1 Splatting 10.5 8% 9.37 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.62% Great: 21%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB 10,530 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 451GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1.16.2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,600 Write 576 Mixed 781 215% 986 MB/s	4K Read 47.6 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 55.3 209% 75.7 MB/s	DQ Read 4.7 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 108 95% 133 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 313%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 10GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 22 Write 5.7 Mixed 4.2 10% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 8.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.4 153% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M8FF 1x16GB 348 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 12.2 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 11.5 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 391 10% 391 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

CPU
Core i5-12500HIntelBench 94%, 11,588 samples	1x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 15%, 7,232 samples	1x

SSD
512GB SSD 512GBLexarBench 143%, 10,530 samples	1x

RAM
CT16G4SFRA32A.M8FF 1x16GBCrucialBench 40%, 348 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16