| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-R (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191014 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 07 '23 at 18:54 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 41% |
PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
65.4%
Good
|
75% 135 Pts
|
44% 327 Pts
|
21% 345 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gainward(10B0 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.8%
Poor
|
30% 38.1 fps
|
27% 34.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF870400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 57 56 50 20 30 MB/s
|
38.5%
Below average
|
54% 244 MB/s
|
50% 16.4 MB/s
|
34% 63.3 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
695GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 118 118 123 120 121 MB/s
|
58.4%
Above average
|
67% 91.6 MB/s
|
84% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT4G4DFS6266.C4FJ 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
66.9%
Good
|
68% 23.7 GB/s
|
61% 21.3 GB/s
|
44% 90.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME A320M-R Builds (Compare 617 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-R
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 89x |
| Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 55x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AFAMD $97Bench 72%, 52,721 samples | 53x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 102x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 56x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 48x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $313 |