PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 57.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Fujitsu ESPRIMO E720 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D3221-A1 |
Memory | 2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190826 |
Uptime | 8.1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 07 '23 at 16:57 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 52% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
64.7%
Good
|
66% 111 Pts
|
37% 281 Pts
|
17% 277 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$130
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
57.4%
Above average
|
59% 70.7 fps
|
55% 66.8 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intenso Sata III 240GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
|
56% 254 MB/s
|
27% 7.47 MB/s
|
||
![]() CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
819GB free
Firmware: M6CR056
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 197 209 224 228 223 MB/s
|
51.6%
Above average
|
47% 208 MB/s
|
77% 27.6 MB/s
|
61% 118 MB/s
|
![]() WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
42GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 68 69 68 68 MB/s
|
40.1%
Average
|
48% 64.5 MB/s
|
108% 0.73 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45.2%
Average
|
44% 15.4 GB/s
|
40% 13.9 GB/s
|
52% 76.7 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5% | 5% | 22 | 197 | 25 | 60 | 24" | 1920 1080 | ACR0575 ED273 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 87x |
Core i5-4570Intel $86Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 44x |
Core i7-4790Intel $185Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 23x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 97x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 21x |
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 19x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $220 |