Fujitsu ESPRIMO E720

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO E720  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3221-A1
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190826
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '23 at 16:57
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 52%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 168
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 290
37% 281 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.4% Above average
Lighting 72.1
Reflection 73.4
Parallax 66.6
59% 70.7 fps
MRender 61.4
Gravity 71.6
Splatting 67.3
55% 66.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 240GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 408
Write 342
Mixed 13.4
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.5
27% 7.47 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 102%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
819GB free
Firmware: M6CR056
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 197 209 224 228 223 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.6% Above average
Read 220
Write 209
Mixed 193
SusWrite 208
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 17.1
77% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 35.2
61% 118 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
42GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 68 69 68 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 71.1
Write 66
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 68.6
48% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.2% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO E720 Builds (Compare 301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback