PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds) |
Memory | 25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20220523 |
Uptime | 1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 06 '23 at 19:41 |
Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i7-7820X-$400
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
|
86.7%
Excellent
|
84% 153 Pts
|
85% 702 Pts
|
85% 1,370 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1080-$323
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
101%
Outstanding
|
102% 135 fps
|
98% 120 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$120
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 148 144 145 142 144 MB/s
|
97%
Outstanding
|
75% 335 MB/s
|
174% 61.5 MB/s
|
181% 297 MB/s
|
![]() Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
322GB free
Firmware: GG2OACY0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 86 86 82 85 85 MB/s
|
49.9%
Average
|
56% 76.8 MB/s
|
102% 0.8 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Corsair CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
68.5%
Good
|
74% 25.9 GB/s
|
41% 14.2 GB/s
|
47% 85.6 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 66 | 48 | 100 | 24.5" | 1280 720 | AOC2590 2590G4 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i7-7820XIntel $400Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 123x |
Core i7-7800XIntel $295Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 112x |
Core i9-7900XIntel $449Bench 82%, 19,432 samples | 86x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $325Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 61x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $323Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 58x |
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 31x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $1,022 |