Gigabyte GA-Z390 D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive522% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 D  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '23 at 10:23
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 214
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 598
61% 494 Pts
64-Core 702
43% 702 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32% Below average
Lighting 43.3
Reflection 33.9
Parallax 54.3
35% 43.8 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 45
Splatting 22.6
26% 32.2 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0C 1TB
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 44 44 44 45 45 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
522% Outstanding
Read 5,870
Write 46.5
Mixed 92.1
SusWrite 43.7
314% 1,513 MB/s
4K Read 705
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 6.3
1,078% 238 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 522%
Great: 269%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
103GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 106 107 107 109 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 82.2
Write 107
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 108
63% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 59%
WD WD10EVDS-63N5B1 1TB
65GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 60 62 60 62 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 85.1
Write 81.7
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 61.4
52% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 57%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$85
64GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 96 96 97 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 91.1
Write 80.9
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 96.1
60% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
95GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 83 77 76 78 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 151
Write 152
Mixed 95.2
SusWrite 78
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.8
382% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
360GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 95 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 68.3
Write 96.5
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 96.7
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
195% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 92%
WD Elements 25A3 18TB
11.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 143 141 139 143 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 54.2
Write 87
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 142
127% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
152% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 110%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 2TB
15GB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 162
Write 131
Mixed 79
SusWrite 44.1
129% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 59%
WD 10EAVS External 1TB
6GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 16 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.3% Terrible
Read 17.4
Write 25.6
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 16.8
28% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
34% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 7.3%
Great: 22%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
8GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 81 78 92 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 103
Write 114
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 87.4
132% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.3
218% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 98%
WD Elements 2TB
14GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 14 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 58.7
Write 20.9
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 14.4
32% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.6
27% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 44%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 2TB
15GB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 44 44 45 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 74.5
Write 85.4
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 44
88% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C20 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.4% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 19.5
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 13.4
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 D Builds (Compare 2,281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $641
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback